Selecting Shepherds in 2014:
Can It Be an Exercise in Spiritual Growth?
The elders are using this week’s blog entry to address a matter of our
congregational life together, maybe a bit of departure from our usual use of
this space.
This
is the year for what has become our biannual shepherd selection process. This
year, Brian Potts’s and John Wright’s current terms are coming to a close, and
should they desire to continue, their service will be brought up for
reaffirmation. Additionally, we would
like to open up the opportunity for new elders to be appointed.
In
2004, we began using a system for shepherd selection that was predicated on a
number of principles:
- That the congregation as a whole should be involved in selecting its leaders (and would want to be involved);
- That the congregation as a whole—prayerfully, having been reminded of the scriptural teachings on leadership among God’s people—was wise enough to see who among us is following in the steps of Jesus in a way that the rest of us want to follow him;
- That God through his Spirit could and would superintend such a process as we bathed the process in prayer;
- That being appointed an elder was not like being appointed to a Federal judgeship: no one was to serve longer than four years without the congregation prayerfully reaffirming that this is someone who is leading us in the steps of Jesus;
- That through participating in the process, all members would be able to feel that our elders were not “the church’s” elders, but “our” elders.
We’re ten years down the line in using that procedure with a tweak or
two here or there. Integral to the process is that the congregation is asked to
nominate men deemed qualified to serve. Full participation by the church family
is key to the success of the system.
One of the things that is concerning to the current elders is the perceived
drop over the years in the number of people who participate in the nominating process:
In 2004, 102 people turned in nomination forms
In 2006, 91 people turned in nomination forms
In 2008, 85 people turned in nomination forms
In 2010, 65 people turned in nomination forms
No individuals
received a sufficient number of nominations to be considered “called out” by
the congregation to serve
In
2012, 88 people turned in nomination forms
(although 25 of those checked the box that they did not see anyone in their
prayerful deliberations that they wished to nominate)
Again, no
individuals received a sufficient number of nominations to be considered
“called out” by the congregation to serve
The concern is this: What does the drop in participation (and the
accompanying reality that no individuals are receiving sizable numbers of
nominations) mean? Does it represent a lack of faith in the procedure? Or, does
it mean that the congregation is being very careful in its prayerful assessment
of potential elders? Or, is it a sign of an even deeper issue, that we are so
disconnected as a congregation that we really would not even be able know who
is and who is not qualified to serve as an elder? Has the present process just
become a popularity contest, a congregational equivalent to a class election?
This is a topic the elders are prayerfully discussing among themselves
right now. In coming weeks, we will be proposing some changes to the current
procedure in an effort to increase your participation and to better be able to
identify those whom God has prepared to lead Southeastern. And in coming weeks,
we will be looking for some input from you on how to make our shepherd
selection process something that truly enhances the life of this church.
We ask you to carefully and prayerfully consider your personal
responsibility and participation in the process. All members, from the youngest
to the oldest are encouraged to invest themselves in the care and development
of our church family.
If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to discuss
it with any of your elders.
No comments:
Post a Comment