An Alternative Faith
Last Sunday morning, I was blessed to be part of a truly challenging
(and for a typical “church Bible class,” pretty honest and open) discussion
about the reality that faith is tough in this age. Oh, it’s relatively easy for us to give our mental
assent to a set of beliefs. But that’s
not the issue. The difficult issue is trusting God. And as far as Jesus and Paul and Peter and
James (and pretty much any of the Biblical writers you want to cite) are
concerned, what we call “faith” is ultimately a question of trust. And more than that (here’s where it gets
tough), “faith” is about acting as if
you trust God in what he has said, what he asks, even demands, of us, what he
has promised. Faith/trust, then, is not
about what happens between our ears, but about how we speak and act.
I’ve continued to think about that discussion off and on this week.
The problem is this: My faith/trust is not nearly as solid as I might
want it to be. Not nearly as solid as I
certainly want others to think it is.
I’m not talking
about not believing basic points of “the faith,” points that are about belief’s
content. God exists, Jesus is
God-in-the-flesh, he is the source of salvation, and he calls us to love him
with our whole being and love neighbor as self.
I don’t have issues
with the content issue. I have issues
with the trust issue: Do I trust God enough to live out his way? Especially when it’s hard.
In that regard, I resonate with the words of Christian Wiman (My Bright Abyss: Meditation of a Modern
Believer, 93):
“Faith steals upon
you like dew: some days you wake and it
is there. And like dew, it gets burned
off in the rising sun of anxieties, ambitions, distractions.”
“Burned off in the
rising sun of anxieties, ambitions, distractions.” I think I just took a hit there.
I wonder if I’m not looking at this from the wrong perspective, though.
I’m defining faith/trust as if it’s all
about me, all a function of something I do.
But maybe whether I
live with trust in God isn’t just about me. Maybe I’m so busy focusing on my response,
that I’m not paying sufficient attention to what I’m responding to. Maybe first and foremost this is about God.
My appreciation is
growing for Paul’s words right at the beginning of 1 Corinthians,
specifically 1.4-9: I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of
God that has been given you in Christ Jesus, for in every way you have been
enriched in him, in speech and knowledge of every kind—just as the testimony of
Christ has been strengthened among you—so that you are not lacking in any
spiritual gift as you wait for the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ. He will
also strengthen you to the end, so that you may be blameless on the day of our
Lord Jesus Christ. God is faithful; by
him you were called into the fellowship of his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
And the way these
folks were living out their faith/trust was pretty sorry. No more or less sorry than the way I live out
my faith/trust. I can’t claim any
superiority over them. The specifics may
be different, but the lack of enough trust to live fully God’s ways is pretty
much the same.
And yet Paul
actually says this to these people (and to us): “He will…strengthen you to the end, so that
you may be blameless (blameless?!) on
the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Really?
Have you read the rest of 1 Corinthians?
There’s a lot of blame that could be
spread around in there.
But this isn’t about
their faith/trust being perfect: “God is faithful.”
“God is faithful.”
Maybe just as “we
love because he first loved us,” we learn to trust him because he is first
trustworthy to us, not waiting for us to earn his trust.
While pretty much
always saying I don’t “believe” this, I think I’ve pretty much always operated
in real time as if my relationship with God works like this: If I can just be faithful enough, God will in
turn be faithful to me. (God is faithful
only as a means of reward for good behavior, in other words; my faithfulness
enables God to be faithful to me.)
Because that’s how
I’ve operated, I’ve always had a hard time figuring out the line in the little
hymn quote found in 2 Timothy 2.13: …if we
are faithless, he remains faithful— for he cannot deny himself. Being faithful is just part of who God is. And he knows we aren’t always faithful.
So, I’m beginning to
think that it’s the other way around from how I’ve operated: because God is faithful to me, I’m
enabled to be faithful to him.
So, I wonder: What difference
would it make in my life—in what I say and do, in how I operate as an agent of
God in this world—if my focus was on God’s consistent, constant trustworthiness
rather than on my fickle faith? Would I feel
myself freed up to more aggressively pursue his ways if I learned to rest in
his faithfulness/trustworthiness instead of being trapped in this no-win
situation of trying to rely on my untrustworthy
ability to choose the right? Would I
live more faithfully to God if I just accepted that he is faithful to me, that
he will deal trustworthily with me according to his promises in Christ? Would I live more faithfully to God if I quit
trying to live into my own faithfulness and instead lived as if he is faithful
to me? Does it make a practical
difference to live in response to
God’s faithfulness?
I’m still thinking
about all this and praying about it, but in the faith chaos that whirls around
our hearts in this present age, is there any true alternative to us for a “rock
to stand on” than the fact that “God is faithful”?
May the God of peace himself
sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and
blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. The one who calls you is faithful, and he
will do this (1 Thessalonians 5.23-24).
No comments:
Post a Comment